Who is better, Aaqib or Coney?
Jeremy Coney leads with a GOAT score of 82.2 against 82.1 for Aaqib Javed — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Aaqib vs Coney
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jeremy Coney above Aaqib Javed: 82.2 vs 82.1. Jeremy Coney leads on Longevity, Dominance. Aaqib Javed leads on Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ConeyWinner
82.2Coney wins: Dominance, Longevity
Aaqib
82.1Aaqib wins: Peak, Honours
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/aaqib-javed-vs-jeremy-coney
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇳🇿 Jeremy Coney
82.2
Coney leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Jeremy Coney
2. Aaqib Javed
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇳🇿 Jeremy Coney5 years played · career day 1,825273 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇵🇰 Aaqib Javed5 years played · career day 2,191116 runs
-57.5% vs Coney at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇵🇰 Aaqib | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 54 | 182 |
| 🇳🇿 Coney | 0 | 0 | 45 | 95 | 273 | 578 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Coney82.2
Aaqib82.1
FAQ
Where does Aaqib beat Coney?
Aaqib scores higher on peak, honours. Coney leads on dominance, longevity.
How is the Aaqib vs Coney score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Aaqib: 82.1, Coney: 82.2.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Aaqib vs Coney. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.