Who is better, Donald or Blanda?
Aaron Donald leads with a GOAT score of 89.1 against 89.1 for George Blanda — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Aaron Donald and George Blanda level at 89.1. Aaron Donald leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. George Blanda leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Donald wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Blanda wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/aaron-donald-vs-george-blanda
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Donald leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Donald | 0 | 0 | 9 | 20 | 59.5 | 103 |
| 🇺🇸 Blanda | 0 | 0 | 35 | 74 | 215 | 458 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | DonaldRetired | BlandaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Defensive Player of the Year | 3 | — |
| Super Bowl titles | 1 | — |
| Pro Bowls | 10 | — |
| Career sacks | 111 | — |
| All-Pro First Teams | 8 | — |
| Tackles for loss | 176 | — |
| Seasons played | — | 26 |
| Career points | — | 2,002 |
| Passing touchdowns | — | 236 |
| AFL titles | — | 2 |
| AFL MVP awards | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 90 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 99 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 94 |
Aaron Donald leads with a GOAT score of 89.1 against 89.1 for George Blanda — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Blanda scores higher on statistics, longevity. Donald leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Donald: 89.1, Blanda: 89.1.
Make your case for Donald vs Blanda. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.