Who is better, de Villiers or Mandhana?
Smriti Mandhana leads with a GOAT score of 84.8 against 84.7 for AB de Villiers — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
de Villiers vs Mandhana
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Smriti Mandhana above AB de Villiers: 84.8 vs 84.7. Smriti Mandhana leads on Honours, Dominance. AB de Villiers leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
MandhanaWinner
84.8Mandhana wins: Dominance, Honours
de Villiers
84.7de Villiers wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/ab-de-villiers-vs-smriti-mandhana
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇮🇳 Smriti Mandhana
84.8
Mandhana leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Smriti Mandhana
2. AB de Villiers
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇿🇦 AB de Villiers5 years played · career day 2,191248 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇮🇳 Smriti Mandhana5 years played · career day 2,190228 runs
-8.1% vs de Villiers at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇿🇦 de Villiers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 135 | 435 |
| 🇮🇳 Mandhana | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 168 | 400 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | de VilliersRetired | MandhanaActive |
|---|---|---|
| Test runs | 8,765 | — |
| ODI runs | 9,577 | 4,000 |
| ODI average | 53.5 | — |
| Fastest ODI century (balls) | 31 | — |
| ICC Player of the Year | 1 | — |
| Test centuries | 22 | — |
| ODI centuries | — | 10 |
| ICC Cricketer of the Year awards | — | 2 |
| T20I runs | — | 3,500 |
| Career-high ODI ranking | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 92 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Mandhana84.8
de Villiers84.7
FAQ
Where does de Villiers beat Mandhana?
de Villiers scores higher on longevity. Mandhana leads on dominance, honours.
How is the de Villiers vs Mandhana score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. de Villiers: 84.7, Mandhana: 84.8.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for de Villiers vs Mandhana. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.