Who is better, Qadir or Cook?
Jimmy Cook leads with a GOAT score of 87.0 against 86.8 for Abdul Qadir — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jimmy Cook above Abdul Qadir: 87.0 vs 86.8. Jimmy Cook leads on Longevity, Statistics. Abdul Qadir leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Cook wins: Longevity, Statistics
Qadir wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/abdul-qadir-vs-jimmy-cook
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Cook leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇵🇰 Qadir | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 54 | 210 |
| 🇿🇦 Cook | 0 | 0 | 45 | 93 | 200 | 525 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | QadirRetired | CookRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Test wickets | 236 | — |
| Best innings figures | 9 | — |
| Five-wicket hauls | 15 | — |
| ODI wickets | 132 | — |
| Tests played | 67 | 3 |
| First-class runs | — | 21,143 |
| First-class centuries | — | 64 |
| Runs in the 1991 county season | — | 2,755 |
| Seasons played | — | 22 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 90 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 96 |
Jimmy Cook leads with a GOAT score of 87.0 against 86.8 for Abdul Qadir — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Qadir scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Cook leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Qadir: 86.8, Cook: 87.0.
Make your case for Qadir vs Cook. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.