Who is better, Attell or Pep?
Abe Attell leads with a GOAT score of 90.3 against 89.8 for Willie Pep — a gap of 0.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Attell vs Pep
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Abe Attell above Willie Pep: 90.3 vs 89.8. Abe Attell leads on Peak, Dominance, Honours. Willie Pep leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
AttellWinner
90.3Attell wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Pep
89.8Pep wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to BoxingShareable URL · /compare/abe-attell-vs-willie-pep
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Abe Attell
90.3
Attell leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Abe Attell
2. Willie Pep
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Abe Attell5 years played · career day 1,825291 title wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Willie Pep5 years played · career day 1,82694 title wins
-67.7% vs Attell at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Attell | 0 | 0 | 45 | 97 | 291 | 641 |
| 🇺🇸 Pep | 0 | 0 | 16 | 37 | 76 | 147 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Attell90.3
Pep89.8
FAQ
Where does Pep beat Attell?
Pep scores higher on longevity. Attell leads on peak, dominance, honours.
How is the Attell vs Pep score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Attell: 90.3, Pep: 89.8.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Attell vs Pep. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.