Who is better, Bikila or Andrei?
Abebe Bikila leads with a GOAT score of 85.8 against 85.7 for Alessandro Andrei — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Abebe Bikila above Alessandro Andrei: 85.8 vs 85.7. Abebe Bikila leads on Dominance, Honours. Alessandro Andrei leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bikila wins: Dominance, Honours
Andrei wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/abebe-bikila-vs-alessandro-andrei
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bikila leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇪🇹 Bikila | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| 🇮🇹 Andrei | 0 | 0 | 45 | 99 | 314 | 672 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BikilaRetired | AndreiRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 2 | — |
| Marathon world bests | 2 | — |
| Olympic marathon titles in a row | 2 | — |
| Career marathon wins | 12 | — |
| Best marathon time (min) | 132.2 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| World records set | — | 3 |
| Personal best in centimetres | — | 2,272 |
| Italian titles | — | 10 |
| World Indoor medals | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 90 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 70 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 90 |
Abebe Bikila leads with a GOAT score of 85.8 against 85.7 for Alessandro Andrei — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Andrei scores higher on statistics, longevity. Bikila leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bikila: 85.8, Andrei: 85.7.
Make your case for Bikila vs Andrei. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.