Who is better, Bikila or Bergqvist?
Abebe Bikila leads with a GOAT score of 85.8 against 85.8 for Kajsa Bergqvist — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Abebe Bikila and Kajsa Bergqvist level at 85.8. Abebe Bikila leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Kajsa Bergqvist leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bikila wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Bergqvist wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/abebe-bikila-vs-kajsa-bergqvist
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bikila leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇪🇹 Bikila | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| 🇸🇪 Bergqvist | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.88 | 13.88 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BikilaRetired | BergqvistRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 2 | — |
| Marathon world bests | 2 | — |
| Olympic marathon titles in a row | 2 | — |
| Career marathon wins | 12 | — |
| Best marathon time (min) | 132.2 | — |
| World Championship golds | — | 1 |
| Olympic medals | — | 1 |
| World indoor titles | — | 2 |
| Indoor world record | — | 2.08 |
| Outdoor personal best | — | 2.06 |
| Dominance w25% | 90 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 70 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 88 |
Abebe Bikila leads with a GOAT score of 85.8 against 85.8 for Kajsa Bergqvist — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Bergqvist scores higher on statistics, longevity. Bikila leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bikila: 85.8, Bergqvist: 85.8.
Make your case for Bikila vs Bergqvist. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.