Who is better, Gruenig or Aldridge?
Ace Gruenig leads with a GOAT score of 81.3 against 81.2 for LaMarcus Aldridge — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ace Gruenig above LaMarcus Aldridge: 81.3 vs 81.2. Ace Gruenig leads on Dominance, Honours, Peak. LaMarcus Aldridge leads on Statistics, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Gruenig wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Aldridge wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/ace-gruenig-vs-lamarcus-aldridge
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Gruenig leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Gruenig | 0 | 0 | 62 | 134 | 396 | 766 |
| 🇺🇸 Aldridge | 0 | 0 | 9 | 26.8 | 84.6 | 174 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GruenigRetired | AldridgeRetired |
|---|---|---|
| AAU All-American selections | 10 | — |
| AAU national titles | 2 | — |
| Hall of Fame induction | 1,963 | — |
| AAU seasons | 14 | — |
| Years at the top level | 14 | — |
| All-Star selections | — | 7 |
| All-NBA teams | — | 5 |
| Career points | — | 20,558 |
| Points per game peak | — | 23.4 |
| Career rebounds | — | 8,478 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 90 |
Ace Gruenig leads with a GOAT score of 81.3 against 81.2 for LaMarcus Aldridge — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Aldridge scores higher on statistics, longevity. Gruenig leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Gruenig: 81.3, Aldridge: 81.2.
Make your case for Gruenig vs Aldridge. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.