Who is better, Parker or Singletary?
Ace Parker leads with a GOAT score of 83.8 against 83.7 for Mike Singletary — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ace Parker above Mike Singletary: 83.8 vs 83.7. Ace Parker leads on Dominance, Peak. Mike Singletary leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Parker wins: Dominance, Peak
Singletary wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/ace-parker-vs-mike-singletary
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Parker leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Parker | 0 | 0 | 50 | 115 | 378 | 620 |
| 🇺🇸 Singletary | 0 | 0 | 80 | 210 | 675 | 1,239 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ParkerRetired | SingletaryRetired |
|---|---|---|
| NFL MVP awards | 1 | — |
| All-Pro selections | 3 | — |
| Career passing yards | 4,744 | — |
| Career interceptions | 17 | — |
| Seasons played | 9 | — |
| Super Bowl titles | — | 1 |
| Defensive Player of the Year awards | — | 2 |
| Pro Bowl selections | — | 10 |
| All-Pro first teams | — | 7 |
| Career tackles | — | 1,488 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 86 |
Ace Parker leads with a GOAT score of 83.8 against 83.7 for Mike Singletary — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Singletary scores higher on honours, longevity. Parker leads on peak, dominance.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Parker: 83.8, Singletary: 83.7.
Make your case for Parker vs Singletary. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.