Who is better, Parker or Grange?
Ace Parker leads with a GOAT score of 83.8 against 83.8 for Red Grange — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Parker vs Grange
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Ace Parker and Red Grange level at 83.8. Ace Parker leads on Longevity, Statistics. Red Grange leads on Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ParkerWinner
83.8Parker wins: Longevity, Statistics
Grange
83.8Grange wins: Dominance, Peak
Candidates
Locked to American FootballShareable URL · /compare/ace-parker-vs-red-grange
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Ace Parker
83.8
Parker leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Ace Parker
2. Red Grange
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Red Grange5 seasons played · career day 1,825388 touchdowns
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Ace Parker5 seasons played · career day 1,825378 touchdowns
-2.6% vs Grange at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Parker | 0 | 0 | 50 | 115 | 378 | 620 |
| 🇺🇸 Grange | 0 | 0 | 50 | 124 | 388 | 617 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Parker83.8
Grange83.8
FAQ
Where does Grange beat Parker?
Grange scores higher on peak, dominance. Parker leads on statistics, longevity.
How is the Parker vs Grange score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Parker: 83.8, Grange: 83.8.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Parker vs Grange. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.