Who is better, Hakimi or Blackstenius?
Achraf Hakimi leads with a GOAT score of 80.1 against 79.9 for Stina Blackstenius — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Hakimi vs Blackstenius
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
HakimiWinner
80.1Hakimi wins: Dominance, Honours
Blackstenius
79.9Blackstenius wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to FootballShareable URL · /compare/achraf-hakimi-vs-stina-blackstenius
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇲🇦 Achraf Hakimi
80.1
Hakimi leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Achraf Hakimi
2. Stina Blackstenius
Category breakdown
Season form · Goals per season
Career timeline · Goals per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Through age 21 · Goals per season
1. 🇲🇦 Achraf Hakimi5 goals
3 seasons by age 21 · 1.7 per season
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Blackstenius — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | HakimiActive | BlacksteniusActive |
|---|---|---|
| Champions League titles | 1 | 1 |
| Ligue 1 titles | 3 | — |
| Serie A titles | 1 | — |
| Morocco caps | 83 | — |
| Career league goals | 35 | — |
| Olympic silver medals | — | 2 |
| Sweden goals | — | 45 |
| Sweden caps | — | 115 |
| World Cup bronze medals | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 85 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 75 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 80 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Hakimi80.1
Blackstenius79.9
FAQ
Where does Blackstenius beat Hakimi?
Blackstenius scores higher on peak, statistics, longevity. Hakimi leads on dominance, honours.
How is the Hakimi vs Blackstenius score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Hakimi: 80.1, Blackstenius: 79.9.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Hakimi vs Blackstenius. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.