Who is better, Gilchrist or Harmanpreet?
Adam Gilchrist leads with a GOAT score of 86.5 against 86.5 for Harmanpreet Kaur — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Gilchrist vs Harmanpreet
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Adam Gilchrist and Harmanpreet Kaur level at 86.5. Adam Gilchrist leads on Honours. Harmanpreet Kaur leads on Longevity, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
GilchristWinner
86.5Gilchrist wins: Honours
Harmanpreet
86.5Harmanpreet wins: Peak, Longevity
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/adam-gilchrist-vs-harmanpreet-kaur
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇦🇺 Adam Gilchrist
86.5
Gilchrist leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Adam Gilchrist
2. Harmanpreet Kaur
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇦🇺 Adam Gilchrist5 years played · career day 4,382285 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇮🇳 Harmanpreet Kaur5 years played · career day 2,19020 runs
-93.0% vs Gilchrist at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Gilchrist | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 108 |
| 🇮🇳 Harmanpreet | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 41 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GilchristRetired | HarmanpreetActive |
|---|---|---|
| World Cups | 3 | — |
| Test runs | 5,570 | — |
| ODI runs | 9,619 | 3,800 |
| Test dismissals | 416 | — |
| Test strike rate | 81.95 | — |
| Test centuries | 17 | — |
| Highest World Cup score | — | 171 |
| T20 international runs | — | 3,500 |
| Asia Cup titles | — | 3 |
| Matches as captain | — | 150 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 90 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Gilchrist86.5
Harmanpreet86.5
The people
Gilchrist
Harmanpreet
Loading votes
Create a free account to vote and comment.
Sign in to voteFAQ
Where does Harmanpreet beat Gilchrist?
Harmanpreet scores higher on peak, longevity. Gilchrist leads on honours.
How is the Gilchrist vs Harmanpreet score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Gilchrist: 86.5, Harmanpreet: 86.5.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Gilchrist vs Harmanpreet. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.