Who is better, Gilchrist or Afridi?
Shahid Afridi leads with a GOAT score of 86.6 against 86.5 for Adam Gilchrist — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Shahid Afridi above Adam Gilchrist: 86.6 vs 86.5. Shahid Afridi leads on Longevity, Peak, Statistics. Adam Gilchrist leads on Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Afridi wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Gilchrist wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/adam-gilchrist-vs-shahid-afridi
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Afridi leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Gilchrist | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 108 |
| 🇵🇰 Afridi | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30 | 148 | 314 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GilchristRetired | AfridiRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Cups | 3 | — |
| Test runs | 5,570 | — |
| ODI runs | 9,619 | 8,064 |
| Test dismissals | 416 | — |
| Test strike rate | 81.95 | — |
| Test centuries | 17 | — |
| ODI wickets | — | 395 |
| T20 World Cup titles | — | 1 |
| Fastest ODI century (balls) | — | 37 |
| ODI sixes | — | 351 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 90 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 92 |
Shahid Afridi leads with a GOAT score of 86.6 against 86.5 for Adam Gilchrist — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Gilchrist scores higher on dominance, honours. Afridi leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Gilchrist: 86.5, Afridi: 86.6.
Make your case for Gilchrist vs Afridi. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.