Who is better, Adelardo or El Khatib?
Adelardo Rodríguez leads with a GOAT score of 81.2 against 81.2 for Mahmoud El Khatib — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Adelardo Rodríguez and Mahmoud El Khatib level at 81.2. Adelardo Rodríguez leads on Longevity, Dominance. Mahmoud El Khatib leads on Statistics, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Adelardo wins: Dominance, Longevity
El Khatib wins: Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/adelardo-vs-mahmoud-el-khatib
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Adelardo leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇪🇸 Adelardo | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 282 | 622 |
| 🇪🇬 El Khatib | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 30 | 100 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AdelardoRetired | El KhatibRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Appearances for Atlético de Madrid | 553 | — |
| La Liga titles | 3 | — |
| Copa del Rey titles | 5 | — |
| European Cup Winners' Cups | 1 | — |
| Spain caps | 14 | — |
| African Footballer of the Year awards | — | 1 |
| Africa Cup of Nations titles | — | 1 |
| Egyptian Premier League titles | — | 10 |
| Al Ahly goals | — | 108 |
| Egypt caps | — | 74 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 82 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 74 | 80 |
Adelardo Rodríguez leads with a GOAT score of 81.2 against 81.2 for Mahmoud El Khatib — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
El Khatib scores higher on peak, statistics. Adelardo leads on dominance, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Adelardo: 81.2, El Khatib: 81.2.
Make your case for Adelardo vs El Khatib. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.