Who is better, Adenízia or Rajzman?
Adenízia Silva leads with a GOAT score of 80.7 against 80.7 for Bernard Rajzman — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Adenízia Silva and Bernard Rajzman level at 80.7. Adenízia Silva leads on Longevity, Honours. Bernard Rajzman leads on Dominance, Statistics, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Adenízia wins: Longevity, Honours
Rajzman wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/adenizia-silva-vs-bernard-rajzman
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Adenízia leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇷 Adenízia | 0 | 0 | 50 | 110 | 342 | 704 |
| 🇧🇷 Rajzman | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 13 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AdeníziaActive | RajzmanRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 1 | — |
| World Grand Prix titles | 4 | — |
| Club world titles | 3 | — |
| Brazilian league titles | 8 | — |
| Years at the top level | 19 | — |
| Olympic silver medals | — | 1 |
| Pan American medals | — | 3 |
| World Championship appearances | — | 2 |
| Brazil caps | — | 250 |
| Olympic Games contested | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 82 |
Adenízia Silva leads with a GOAT score of 80.7 against 80.7 for Bernard Rajzman — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Rajzman scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Adenízia leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Adenízia: 80.7, Rajzman: 80.7.
Make your case for Adenízia vs Rajzman. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.