Who is better, Annus or Andersson?
Adrián Annus leads with a GOAT score of 82.3 against 82.3 for Arne Andersson — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Annus vs Andersson
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Adrián Annus and Arne Andersson level at 82.3. Adrián Annus leads on Longevity. Arne Andersson leads on Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
AnnusWinner
82.3Annus wins: Longevity
Andersson
82.3Andersson wins: Dominance, Peak
Candidates
Locked to AthleticsShareable URL · /compare/adrian-annus-vs-arne-andersson
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇭🇺 Adrián Annus
82.3
Annus leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Adrián Annus
2. Arne Andersson
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇭🇺 Adrián Annus5 seasons played · career day 2,921388.5 major golds
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇸🇪 Arne Andersson5 seasons played · career day 1,82511 major golds
-97.2% vs Annus at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇭🇺 Annus | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 150.2 | 470.1 |
| 🇸🇪 Andersson | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 11 | 13 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Annus82.3
Andersson82.3
FAQ
Where does Andersson beat Annus?
Andersson scores higher on peak, dominance. Annus leads on longevity.
How is the Annus vs Andersson score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Annus: 82.3, Andersson: 82.3.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Annus vs Andersson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.