Who is better, Carambula or Ana Paula?
Adrian Carambula leads with a GOAT score of 79.9 against 79.8 for Ana Paula Henkel — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Adrian Carambula above Ana Paula Henkel: 79.9 vs 79.8. Adrian Carambula leads on Statistics, Peak. Ana Paula Henkel leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Carambula wins: Peak, Statistics
Ana Paula wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/adrian-carambula-bv-vs-ana-paula-henkel
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Carambula leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 Carambula | 0 | 0 | 52 | 114 | 266 | 708 |
| 🇧🇷 Ana Paula | 0 | 0 | 48 | 104 | 320 | 662 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | CarambulaActive | Ana PaulaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Tour medals | 6 | — |
| World Tour titles | 2 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 3 | — |
| European Championship medals | 1 | — |
| Seasons on tour | 13 | — |
| Olympic medals | — | 1 |
| Olympic Games contested | — | 4 |
| Beach World Tour wins | — | 12 |
| World Grand Prix medals | — | 4 |
| Years at the top level | — | 18 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 78 |
Adrian Carambula leads with a GOAT score of 79.9 against 79.8 for Ana Paula Henkel — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Ana Paula scores higher on longevity. Carambula leads on peak, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Carambula: 79.9, Ana Paula: 79.8.
Make your case for Carambula vs Ana Paula. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.