Who is better, Carambula or Érika?
Adrian Carambula leads with a GOAT score of 79.9 against 79.8 for Érika Coimbra — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Adrian Carambula above Érika Coimbra: 79.9 vs 79.8. Adrian Carambula leads on Statistics, Peak. Érika Coimbra leads on Honours, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Carambula wins: Peak, Statistics
Érika wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/adrian-carambula-bv-vs-erika-coimbra
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Carambula leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 Carambula | 0 | 0 | 52 | 114 | 266 | 708 |
| 🇧🇷 Érika | 0 | 0 | 52 | 114 | 366 | 704 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | CarambulaActive | ÉrikaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Tour medals | 6 | — |
| World Tour titles | 2 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 3 | — |
| European Championship medals | 1 | — |
| Seasons on tour | 13 | — |
| Olympic medals | — | 2 |
| World Grand Prix titles | — | 5 |
| World Championship medals | — | 1 |
| Olympic Games contested | — | 3 |
| Years with the national team | — | 14 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 78 |
Adrian Carambula leads with a GOAT score of 79.9 against 79.8 for Érika Coimbra — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Érika scores higher on honours, longevity. Carambula leads on peak, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Carambula: 79.9, Érika: 79.8.
Make your case for Carambula vs Érika. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.