Who is better, Moorhouse or Alexy?
Adrian Moorhouse leads with a GOAT score of 79.5 against 79.5 for Jack Alexy — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Adrian Moorhouse and Jack Alexy level at 79.5. Adrian Moorhouse leads on Longevity. Jack Alexy leads on Statistics, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Moorhouse wins: Longevity
Alexy wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/adrian-moorhouse-vs-jack-alexy
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Moorhouse leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Moorhouse | 0 | 0 | 60 | 130 | 378 | 744 |
| 🇺🇸 Alexy | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 20 | 20 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MoorhouseRetired | AlexyActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 1 | — |
| World records set | 3 | — |
| European Championship golds | 4 | — |
| Commonwealth Games golds | 3 | — |
| Olympic Games contested | 3 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 1 |
| World Championship golds | — | 4 |
| Olympic medals | — | 2 |
| 100 m freestyle best | — | 46.72 |
| NCAA titles | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 60 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 88 |
Adrian Moorhouse leads with a GOAT score of 79.5 against 79.5 for Jack Alexy — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Alexy scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Moorhouse leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Moorhouse: 79.5, Alexy: 79.5.
Make your case for Moorhouse vs Alexy. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.