Who is better, Moorhouse or Acevedo?
Adrian Moorhouse leads with a GOAT score of 79.5 against 79.5 for Javier Acevedo — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Adrian Moorhouse and Javier Acevedo level at 79.5. Adrian Moorhouse leads on Dominance, Peak. Javier Acevedo leads on Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Moorhouse wins: Dominance, Peak
Acevedo wins: Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/adrian-moorhouse-vs-javier-acevedo
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Moorhouse leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Moorhouse | 0 | 0 | 60 | 130 | 378 | 744 |
| 🇨🇦 Acevedo | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 332 | 684 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MoorhouseRetired | AcevedoActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 1 | — |
| World records set | 3 | — |
| European Championship golds | 4 | — |
| Commonwealth Games golds | 3 | — |
| Olympic Games contested | 3 | — |
| Pan American medals | — | 2 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 2 |
| Canadian titles | — | 6 |
| Commonwealth Games appearances | — | 1 |
| National records set | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 84 |
Adrian Moorhouse leads with a GOAT score of 79.5 against 79.5 for Javier Acevedo — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Acevedo scores higher on statistics. Moorhouse leads on peak, dominance.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Moorhouse: 79.5, Acevedo: 79.5.
Make your case for Moorhouse vs Acevedo. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.