Who is better, Moorhouse or Casas?
Adrian Moorhouse leads with a GOAT score of 79.5 against 79.3 for Shaine Casas — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Adrian Moorhouse above Shaine Casas: 79.5 vs 79.3. Adrian Moorhouse leads on Longevity, Dominance. Shaine Casas leads on Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Moorhouse wins: Dominance, Longevity
Casas wins: Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/adrian-moorhouse-vs-shaine-casas
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Moorhouse leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Moorhouse | 0 | 0 | 60 | 130 | 378 | 744 |
| 🇺🇸 Casas | 0 | 0 | 0 | 118.5 | 468.4 | 814.8 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MoorhouseRetired | CasasActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 1 | — |
| World records set | 3 | — |
| European Championship golds | 4 | — |
| Commonwealth Games golds | 3 | — |
| Olympic Games contested | 3 | — |
| World short-course golds | — | 3 |
| World Championship medals | — | 3 |
| NCAA titles | — | 2 |
| 200 m medley best | — | 115.3 |
| US national titles | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 72 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 88 |
Adrian Moorhouse leads with a GOAT score of 79.5 against 79.3 for Shaine Casas — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Casas scores higher on statistics. Moorhouse leads on dominance, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Moorhouse: 79.5, Casas: 79.3.
Make your case for Moorhouse vs Casas. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.