Who is better, Peterson or Hanburger?
Chris Hanburger leads with a GOAT score of 85.6 against 85.5 for Adrian Peterson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Chris Hanburger above Adrian Peterson: 85.6 vs 85.5. Chris Hanburger leads on Longevity, Honours. Adrian Peterson leads on Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Hanburger wins: Longevity, Honours
Peterson wins: Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/adrian-peterson-vs-chris-hanburger
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Hanburger leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Peterson | 0 | 0 | 1,341 | 3,101 | 6,752 | 11,675 |
| 🇺🇸 Hanburger | 0 | 0 | 50 | 106 | 313 | 662 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | PetersonRetired | HanburgerRetired |
|---|---|---|
| MVP awards | 1 | — |
| Rushing yards | 14,918 | — |
| Rushing titles | 3 | — |
| Pro Bowls | 7 | 9 |
| Offensive Player of the Year | 1 | — |
| Rushing touchdowns | 120 | — |
| Career interceptions | — | 19 |
| Defensive touchdowns | — | 5 |
| All-Pro selections | — | 4 |
| Seasons played | — | 14 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 90 |
Chris Hanburger leads with a GOAT score of 85.6 against 85.5 for Adrian Peterson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Peterson scores higher on peak, statistics. Hanburger leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Peterson: 85.5, Hanburger: 85.6.
Make your case for Peterson vs Hanburger. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.