Who is better, Quist or Emerson?
Adrian Quist leads with a GOAT score of 86.8 against 86.7 for Roy Emerson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Adrian Quist above Roy Emerson: 86.8 vs 86.7. Adrian Quist leads on Statistics, Peak. Roy Emerson leads on Dominance, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Quist wins: Peak, Statistics
Emerson wins: Dominance, Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/adrian-quist-vs-roy-emerson
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Quist leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Quist | 0 | 0 | 35 | 79 | 261 | 608 |
| 🇦🇺 Emerson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | QuistRetired | EmersonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Major singles titles | 3 | — |
| Australian doubles titles | 10 | — |
| Davis Cup titles | 2 | — |
| Major doubles titles | 13 | — |
| Australian Championships | 3 | — |
| Grand Slam singles titles | — | 12 |
| Grand Slam doubles titles | — | 16 |
| Davis Cups | — | 8 |
| Australian Open titles | — | 6 |
| Career titles | — | 100 |
| Career Grand Slams | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 86 |
Adrian Quist leads with a GOAT score of 86.8 against 86.7 for Roy Emerson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Emerson scores higher on dominance, longevity. Quist leads on peak, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Quist: 86.8, Emerson: 86.7.
Make your case for Quist vs Emerson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.