Who is better, Adriana or García?
Adriana Silva leads with a GOAT score of 79.4 against 79.4 for Nahikari García — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Adriana Silva and Nahikari García level at 79.4. Adriana Silva leads on Longevity, Honours. Nahikari García leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Adriana wins: Longevity, Honours
García wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/adriana-silva-v-vs-nahikari-garcia-v
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Adriana leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇷 Adriana | 0 | 0 | 48 | 100 | 280 | 576 |
| 🇪🇸 García | 0 | 0 | 50 | 107 | 316 | 662 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AdrianaActive | GarcíaActive |
|---|---|---|
| Copa Libertadores titles | 2 | — |
| Brazilian league titles | 3 | — |
| Brazil caps | 40 | — |
| Copa América titles | 1 | — |
| Career appearances | 300 | — |
| Copa de la Reina titles | — | 1 |
| Spain caps | — | 40 |
| Liga F goals | — | 80 |
| World Cup appearances | — | 1 |
| Career goals | — | 110 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 83 | 85 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 84 |
Adriana Silva leads with a GOAT score of 79.4 against 79.4 for Nahikari García — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
García scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Adriana leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Adriana: 79.4, García: 79.4.
Make your case for Adriana vs García. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.