Who is better, Adriana or Smith?
Adriana Silva leads with a GOAT score of 79.4 against 79.4 for Sophia Smith — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Adriana vs Smith
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Adriana Silva and Sophia Smith level at 79.4. Adriana Silva leads on Longevity. Sophia Smith leads on Peak, Dominance, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
AdrianaWinner
79.4Adriana wins: Longevity
Smith
79.4Smith wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to FootballShareable URL · /compare/adriana-silva-v-vs-sophia-smith
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇧🇷 Adriana Silva
79.4
Adriana leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Adriana Silva
2. Sophia Smith
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇧🇷 Adriana Silva5 seasons played · career day 1,825280 goals
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Sophia Smith5 seasons played · career day 1,82647 goals
-83.2% vs Adriana at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇷 Adriana | 0 | 0 | 48 | 100 | 280 | 576 |
| 🇺🇸 Smith | 0 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 35 | 57 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Adriana79.4
Smith79.4
FAQ
Where does Smith beat Adriana?
Smith scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Adriana leads on longevity.
How is the Adriana vs Smith score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Adriana: 79.4, Smith: 79.4.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Adriana vs Smith. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.