Who is better, Panatta or Henkel?
Adriano Panatta leads with a GOAT score of 76.6 against 76.5 for Henner Henkel — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Adriano Panatta above Henner Henkel: 76.6 vs 76.5. Adriano Panatta leads on Longevity. Henner Henkel leads on Statistics, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Panatta wins: Longevity
Henkel wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/adriano-panatta-vs-henner-henkel
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Panatta leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 Panatta | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 326 | 672 |
| 🇩🇪 Henkel | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 15 | 20 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | PanattaRetired | HenkelRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Major singles titles | 1 | — |
| Career singles titles | 10 | — |
| Davis Cup titles | 1 | — |
| Career-high world ranking | 4 | — |
| Seasons on tour | 14 | — |
| Grand Slam singles titles | — | 1 |
| Grand Slam doubles titles | — | 2 |
| World ranking high | — | 3 |
| Davis Cup wins | — | 27 |
| Career span in years | — | 7 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 62 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 76 | 80 |
Adriano Panatta leads with a GOAT score of 76.6 against 76.5 for Henner Henkel — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Henkel scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Panatta leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Panatta: 76.6, Henkel: 76.5.
Make your case for Panatta vs Henkel. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.