Who is better, Panatta or Vondroušová?
Markéta Vondroušová leads with a GOAT score of 76.9 against 76.6 for Adriano Panatta — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Markéta Vondroušová above Adriano Panatta: 76.9 vs 76.6. Markéta Vondroušová leads on Statistics, Dominance, Peak. Adriano Panatta leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Vondroušová wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Panatta wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/adriano-panatta-vs-marketa-vondrousova
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Vondroušová leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 Panatta | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 326 | 672 |
| 🇨🇿 Vondroušová | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 15 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | PanattaRetired | VondroušováActive |
|---|---|---|
| Major singles titles | 1 | — |
| Career singles titles | 10 | — |
| Davis Cup titles | 1 | — |
| Career-high world ranking | 4 | — |
| Seasons on tour | 14 | — |
| Grand Slam singles titles | — | 1 |
| Olympic medals | — | 1 |
| WTA titles | — | 3 |
| Grand Slam finals | — | 2 |
| Billie Jean King Cup titles | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 72 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 64 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 76 | 80 |
Markéta Vondroušová leads with a GOAT score of 76.9 against 76.6 for Adriano Panatta — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Panatta scores higher on longevity. Vondroušová leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Panatta: 76.6, Vondroušová: 76.9.
Make your case for Panatta vs Vondroušová. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.