GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Panatta vs Osaka

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
PanattaWinner
76.6

Panatta wins: Longevity

Osaka
76.5

Osaka wins: Dominance, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/adriano-panatta-vs-naomi-osaka

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇮🇹 Adriano Panatta
76.6

Panatta leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. French Open champion in 1976 and Davis Cup winner with Italy.

1. Adriano Panatta
76.6
2. Naomi Osaka
76.5

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇮🇹 Adriano Panatta5 seasons played · career day 1,825326 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇯🇵 Naomi Osaka5 seasons played · career day 2,9214 titles
-98.8% vs Panatta at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇮🇹 Panatta0050108326672
🇯🇵 Osaka000005

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricPanattaRetiredOsakaActive
Major singles titles1
Career singles titles10
Davis Cup titles1
Career-high world ranking4
Seasons on tour14
Grand Slam titles4
US Open titles2
Australian Open titles2
Weeks at No. 125
Career titles7
Year-end No. 11
Dominance w25%7274
Peak w20%8888
Longevity w20%7266
Honours w20%7676
Statistics w15%7680

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Panatta76.6
Osaka76.5
The people
Panatta
Osaka

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Panatta vs Osaka. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →