Who is better, Bennett or Baďurová?
Ainsley Bennett leads with a GOAT score of 78.7 against 78.6 for Kateřina Baďurová — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ainsley Bennett above Kateřina Baďurová: 78.7 vs 78.6. Ainsley Bennett leads on Dominance, Honours. Kateřina Baďurová leads on Peak, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bennett wins: Dominance, Honours
Baďurová wins: Peak, Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/ainsley-bennett-vs-kateřina-badurova
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bennett leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Bennett | 0 | 0 | 50 | 110 | 262 | 603 |
| 🇨🇿 Baďurová | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.5 | 31.3 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BennettRetired | BaďurováRetired |
|---|---|---|
| European Championship medals | 1 | — |
| Commonwealth Games medals | 1 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 2 | — |
| British titles | 2 | — |
| Relay finals | 3 | — |
| World Championship medals | — | 1 |
| Pole vault best | — | 4.75 |
| National titles | — | 5 |
| Olympic Games | — | 2 |
| National records | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 72 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 84 |
Ainsley Bennett leads with a GOAT score of 78.7 against 78.6 for Kateřina Baďurová — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Baďurová scores higher on peak, longevity. Bennett leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bennett: 78.7, Baďurová: 78.6.
Make your case for Bennett vs Baďurová. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.