Who is better, Green or Kiesling?
A.J. Green leads with a GOAT score of 84.2 against 84.2 for Walt Kiesling — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Green vs Kiesling
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores A.J. Green and Walt Kiesling level at 84.2. A.J. Green leads on Statistics, Peak. Walt Kiesling leads on Honours, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
GreenWinner
84.2Green wins: Peak, Statistics
Kiesling
84.2Kiesling wins: Longevity, Honours
Candidates
Locked to American FootballShareable URL · /compare/aj-green-vs-walt-kiesling
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 A.J. Green
84.2
Green leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. A.J. Green
2. Walt Kiesling
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 A.J. Green5 seasons played · career day 1,8256,171 touchdowns
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Walt Kiesling5 seasons played · career day 1,825304 touchdowns
-95.1% vs Green at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Green | 0 | 0 | 1,057 | 2,407 | 6,171 | 8,907 |
| 🇺🇸 Kiesling | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 304 | 644 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GreenRetired | KieslingRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Pro Bowls | 7 | — |
| Career receiving yards | 10,514 | — |
| 1,000-yard seasons | 6 | — |
| Career receptions | 727 | — |
| Receiving touchdowns | 70 | — |
| NFL titles | — | 1 |
| All-Pro selections | — | 2 |
| Seasons played | — | 13 |
| Games played | — | 132 |
| Teams played for | — | 5 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 84 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Green84.2
Kiesling84.2
FAQ
Where does Kiesling beat Green?
Kiesling scores higher on honours, longevity. Green leads on peak, statistics.
How is the Green vs Kiesling score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Green: 84.2, Kiesling: 84.2.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Green vs Kiesling. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.