Who is better, Attles or R. Brown?
Roger Brown leads with a GOAT score of 81.0 against 80.9 for Al Attles — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Roger Brown above Al Attles: 81.0 vs 80.9. Roger Brown leads on Peak, Dominance, Statistics. Al Attles leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →R. Brown wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Attles wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/al-attles-vs-roger-brown-aba
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
R. Brown leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Attles | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 248 | 646 |
| 🇺🇸 R. Brown | 0 | 0 | 17.4 | 40.4 | 101.4 | 141.9 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AttlesRetired | R. BrownRetired |
|---|---|---|
| NBA championships as coach | 1 | — |
| NBA games | 711 | — |
| NBA points | 6,328 | — |
| NBA assists | 2,483 | — |
| Seasons with one franchise | 11 | — |
| ABA championships | — | 3 |
| ABA playoff MVP awards | — | 1 |
| ABA All-Star selections | — | 4 |
| Career ABA points per game | — | 17.4 |
| Hall of Fame induction | — | 2,013 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 72 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 84 |
Roger Brown leads with a GOAT score of 81.0 against 80.9 for Al Attles — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Attles scores higher on honours, longevity. R. Brown leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Attles: 80.9, R. Brown: 81.0.
Make your case for Attles vs R. Brown. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.