Who is better, Cervi or Griffith?
Al Cervi leads with a GOAT score of 84.1 against 84.0 for Yolanda Griffith — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Cervi vs Griffith
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Al Cervi above Yolanda Griffith: 84.1 vs 84.0. Al Cervi leads on Longevity. Yolanda Griffith leads on Honours, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
CerviWinner
84.1Cervi wins: Longevity
Griffith
84.0Griffith wins: Honours, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to BasketballShareable URL · /compare/al-cervi-vs-yolanda-griffith
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Al Cervi
84.1
Cervi leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Al Cervi
2. Yolanda Griffith
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Yolanda Griffith5 seasons played · career day 2,55580.9 points per game
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Al Cervi5 seasons played · career day 4,74762.2 points per game
-23.1% vs Griffith at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Cervi | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 |
| 🇺🇸 Griffith | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 51.3 | 107 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Cervi84.1
Griffith84.0
FAQ
Where does Griffith beat Cervi?
Griffith scores higher on honours, statistics. Cervi leads on longevity.
How is the Cervi vs Griffith score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Cervi: 84.1, Griffith: 84.0.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Cervi vs Griffith. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.