Who is better, MacInnis or Blake?
Al MacInnis leads with a GOAT score of 87.6 against 87.6 for Toe Blake — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
MacInnis vs Blake
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Al MacInnis and Toe Blake level at 87.6. Al MacInnis leads on Longevity, Statistics. Toe Blake leads on Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
MacInnisWinner
87.6MacInnis wins: Longevity, Statistics
Blake
87.6Blake wins: Dominance, Honours
Candidates
Locked to Ice HockeyShareable URL · /compare/al-macinnis-vs-toe-blake
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇦 Al MacInnis
87.6
MacInnis leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Al MacInnis
2. Toe Blake
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇨🇦 Al MacInnis5 seasons played · career day 1,825289 points
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇦 Toe Blake5 seasons played · career day 2,190133 points
-54.0% vs MacInnis at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 MacInnis | 0 | 0 | 45 | 96 | 289 | 635 |
| 🇨🇦 Blake | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 94 | 272 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
MacInnis87.6
Blake87.6
FAQ
Where does Blake beat MacInnis?
Blake scores higher on dominance, honours. MacInnis leads on statistics, longevity.
How is the MacInnis vs Blake score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. MacInnis: 87.6, Blake: 87.6.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for MacInnis vs Blake. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.