GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Oerter vs Ottey

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
OerterWinner
89.7

Oerter wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Ottey
87.6

Ottey wins: Longevity, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Athletics

Shareable URL · /compare/al-oerter-vs-merlene-ottey

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Al Oerter
89.7

Oerter leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Four straight Olympic discus golds, each with an Olympic record.

1. Al Oerter
89.7
2. Merlene Ottey
87.6

Category breakdown

Season form · Major golds per season

Career timeline · Major golds per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Major golds per season
1. 🇺🇸 Al Oerter5 seasons played · career day 2,556293.3 major golds
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇯🇲 Merlene Ottey5 seasons played · career day 2,55615 major golds
-94.9% vs Oerter at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Oerter0000173.06416.79
🇯🇲 Ottey0000722

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricOerterRetiredOtteyRetired
Olympic golds4
World records4
Olympic records4
Discus best (m)69.46
US titles6
Consecutive Games won4
Olympic medals9
World Championship medals14
Olympic appearances7
200m best (sec)21.64
World Indoor golds3
Dominance w25%9082
Peak w20%9288
Longevity w20%8896
Honours w20%9084
Statistics w15%8890

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Oerter89.7
Ottey87.6
The people
Oerter
Ottey

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Oerter vs Ottey. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →