GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Faneca vs Webster

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
FanecaWinner
85.8

Faneca wins: Dominance, Statistics

Webster
85.8

Webster wins: Longevity, Honours

Candidates
Locked to American Football

Shareable URL · /compare/alan-faneca-vs-mike-webster

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Alan Faneca
85.8

Faneca leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Super Bowl champion guard with nine Pro Bowls for Pittsburgh and beyond.

1. Alan Faneca
85.8
2. Mike Webster
85.8

Category breakdown

Season form · Touchdowns per season

Career timeline · Touchdowns per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Touchdowns per season
1. 🇺🇸 Alan Faneca5 seasons played · career day 1,82574 touchdowns
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Mike Webster5 seasons played · career day 1,8255 touchdowns
-93.2% vs Faneca at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 Faneca00102674138
🇺🇸 Webster001259

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricFanecaRetiredWebsterRetired
Super Bowl titles14
Pro Bowls9
First-team All-Pro selections6
Games started201
Seasons played13
Pro Bowl selections9
All-Pro first teams5
Games played245
Hall of Fame inductions1
Dominance w25%8280
Peak w20%9090
Longevity w20%8688
Honours w20%8688
Statistics w15%8684

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Faneca85.8
Webster85.8
The people
Faneca
Webster

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Faneca vs Webster. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →