Who is better, Faneca or Jurgensen?
Sonny Jurgensen leads with a GOAT score of 85.9 against 85.8 for Alan Faneca — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Sonny Jurgensen above Alan Faneca: 85.9 vs 85.8. Sonny Jurgensen leads on Longevity, Statistics, Peak. Alan Faneca leads on Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Jurgensen wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Faneca wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/alan-faneca-vs-sonny-jurgensen
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Jurgensen leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Faneca | 0 | 0 | 10 | 26 | 74 | 138 |
| 🇺🇸 Jurgensen | 0 | 0 | 30 | 67 | 216 | 506 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Sonny Jurgensen leads with a GOAT score of 85.9 against 85.8 for Alan Faneca — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Faneca scores higher on dominance, honours. Jurgensen leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Faneca: 85.8, Jurgensen: 85.9.
Make your case for Faneca vs Jurgensen. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.