Who is better, Hansen or Chiellini?
Alan Hansen leads with a GOAT score of 85.8 against 85.8 for Giorgio Chiellini — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Alan Hansen and Giorgio Chiellini level at 85.8. Alan Hansen leads on Dominance, Honours. Giorgio Chiellini leads on Longevity, Statistics, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Hansen wins: Dominance, Honours
Chiellini wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/alan-hansen-vs-giorgio-chiellini
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Hansen leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏴 Hansen | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 286 | 638 |
| 🇮🇹 Chiellini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 37 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HansenRetired | ChielliniRetired |
|---|---|---|
| League titles | 8 | — |
| European Cups | 3 | — |
| FA Cups | 2 | — |
| Appearances for Liverpool | 620 | — |
| Scotland caps | 26 | — |
| European Championship titles | — | 1 |
| Serie A titles | — | 9 |
| Coppa Italia titles | — | 5 |
| Italy caps | — | 117 |
| Serie A appearances | — | 425 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 90 |
| Honours w20% | 94 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 76 | 84 |
Alan Hansen leads with a GOAT score of 85.8 against 85.8 for Giorgio Chiellini — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Chiellini scores higher on peak, statistics, longevity. Hansen leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Hansen: 85.8, Chiellini: 85.8.
Make your case for Hansen vs Chiellini. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.