Who is better, Shearer or Effenberg?
Alan Shearer leads with a GOAT score of 81.5 against 81.5 for Stefan Effenberg — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Alan Shearer and Stefan Effenberg level at 81.5. Alan Shearer leads on Statistics, Longevity. Stefan Effenberg leads on Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Shearer wins: Longevity, Statistics
Effenberg wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/alan-shearer-vs-stefan-effenberg
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Shearer leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏴 Shearer | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 146 |
| 🇩🇪 Effenberg | 0 | 0 | 0 | 58 | 278 | 596 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ShearerRetired | EffenbergRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Premier League goals | 260 | — |
| Premier League titles | 1 | — |
| Golden Boots | 3 | — |
| Career goals | 379 | — |
| England goals | 30 | — |
| PFA Player of the Year | 1 | — |
| Bundesliga titles | — | 3 |
| Champions League titles | — | 1 |
| Germany caps | — | 35 |
| DFB-Pokal titles | — | 1 |
| Bundesliga assists (recorded era) | — | 91 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 78 |
Alan Shearer leads with a GOAT score of 81.5 against 81.5 for Stefan Effenberg — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Effenberg scores higher on dominance, honours. Shearer leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Shearer: 81.5, Effenberg: 81.5.
Make your case for Shearer vs Effenberg. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.