Who is better, Cook or Hockley?
Debbie Hockley leads with a GOAT score of 90.0 against 89.9 for Alastair Cook — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Cook vs Hockley
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Debbie Hockley above Alastair Cook: 90.0 vs 89.9. Debbie Hockley leads on Longevity. Alastair Cook leads on Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
HockleyWinner
90.0Hockley wins: Longevity
Cook
89.9Cook wins: Statistics
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/alastair-cook-vs-debbie-hockley
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇳🇿 Debbie Hockley
90.0
Hockley leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Debbie Hockley
2. Alastair Cook
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🏴 Alastair Cook5 years played · career day 1,825280 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇳🇿 Debbie Hockley5 years played · career day 2,921208 runs
-25.7% vs Cook at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏴 Cook | 0 | 0 | 40 | 88 | 280 | 630 |
| 🇳🇿 Hockley | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 66 | 264 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Hockley90.0
Cook89.9
FAQ
Where does Cook beat Hockley?
Cook scores higher on statistics. Hockley leads on longevity.
How is the Cook vs Hockley score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Cook: 89.9, Hockley: 90.0.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Cook vs Hockley. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.