Who is better, Cook or Sciver-Brunt?
Natalie Sciver-Brunt leads with a GOAT score of 90.0 against 89.9 for Alastair Cook — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Cook vs Sciver-Brunt
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Natalie Sciver-Brunt above Alastair Cook: 90.0 vs 89.9. Natalie Sciver-Brunt leads on Peak, Dominance, Honours. Alastair Cook leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
Sciver-BruntWinner
90.0Sciver-Brunt wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Cook
89.9Cook wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/alastair-cook-vs-natalie-sciver-brunt
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Natalie Sciver-Brunt
90.0
Sciver-Brunt leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Natalie Sciver-Brunt
2. Alastair Cook
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🏴 Alastair Cook5 years played · career day 1,825280 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Natalie Sciver-Brunt5 years played · career day 1,825204 runs
-27.1% vs Cook at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏴 Cook | 0 | 0 | 40 | 88 | 280 | 630 |
| 🇬🇧 Sciver-Brunt | 0 | 0 | 28 | 62 | 204 | 454 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | CookRetired | Sciver-BruntActive |
|---|---|---|
| Test runs | 12,472 | — |
| Test centuries | 33 | — |
| Tests played | 161 | — |
| Consecutive Tests | 159 | — |
| Ashes series wins | 3 | — |
| World Cup titles | — | 1 |
| ICC Cricketer of the Year awards | — | 2 |
| ODI runs | — | 4,000 |
| ODI wickets | — | 80 |
| ODI centuries | — | 9 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 90 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 96 | 96 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Sciver-Brunt90.0
Cook89.9
FAQ
Where does Cook beat Sciver-Brunt?
Cook scores higher on longevity. Sciver-Brunt leads on peak, dominance, honours.
How is the Cook vs Sciver-Brunt score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Cook: 89.9, Sciver-Brunt: 90.0.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Cook vs Sciver-Brunt. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.