Who is better, Cisolla or Walsh Jennings?
Alberto Cisolla leads with a GOAT score of 86.5 against 86.4 for Kerri Walsh Jennings — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Alberto Cisolla above Kerri Walsh Jennings: 86.5 vs 86.4. Alberto Cisolla leads on Statistics. Kerri Walsh Jennings leads on Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Cisolla wins: Statistics
Walsh Jennings wins: Dominance
Shareable URL · /compare/alberto-cisolla-vs-kerri-walsh-jennings
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Cisolla leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 Cisolla | 0 | 0 | 52 | 109 | 238 | 653 |
| 🇺🇸 Walsh Jennings | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | CisollaRetired | Walsh JenningsRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 1 | 4 |
| European titles | 2 | — |
| World League titles | 3 | — |
| Italian league titles | 4 | — |
| CEV Champions League titles | 2 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 3 |
| World Championship titles | — | 4 |
| Tournament wins | — | 135 |
| Consecutive Olympic match wins | — | 21 |
| AVP titles | — | 75 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 84 |
Loading votes
Create a free account to vote and comment.
Sign in to voteAlberto Cisolla leads with a GOAT score of 86.5 against 86.4 for Kerri Walsh Jennings — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Walsh Jennings scores higher on dominance. Cisolla leads on statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Cisolla: 86.5, Walsh Jennings: 86.4.
Make your case for Cisolla vs Walsh Jennings. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.