Who is better, Juantorena or Devers?
Alberto Juantorena leads with a GOAT score of 85.6 against 85.5 for Gail Devers — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Alberto Juantorena above Gail Devers: 85.6 vs 85.5. Alberto Juantorena leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Gail Devers leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Juantorena wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Devers wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/alberto-juantorena-vs-gail-devers
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Juantorena leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇺 Juantorena | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 35 |
| 🇺🇸 Devers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12.48 | 62.78 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | JuantorenaRetired | DeversRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 2 | 3 |
| World records | 2 | — |
| World Cup titles | 2 | — |
| 800m best (sec) | 103.44 | — |
| 400m best (sec) | 44.26 | — |
| World Championship golds | — | 5 |
| 100 m personal best | — | 10.82 |
| 100 m hurdles best (s) | — | 12.33 |
| World indoor golds | — | 4 |
| US titles | — | 12 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 84 |
Alberto Juantorena leads with a GOAT score of 85.6 against 85.5 for Gail Devers — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Devers scores higher on longevity. Juantorena leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Juantorena: 85.6, Devers: 85.5.
Make your case for Juantorena vs Devers. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.