Who is better, Bailey or Baulch?
Aleen Bailey leads with a GOAT score of 81.0 against 81.0 for Jamie Baulch — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Aleen Bailey and Jamie Baulch level at 81.0.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bailey wins: no category outright
Baulch wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/aleen-bailey-vs-jamie-baulch
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bailey leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇯🇲 Bailey | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11.3 | 44.52 | 88.71 |
| 🇬🇧 Baulch | 0 | 0 | 0 | 46.2 | 181.47 | 363.07 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BaileyRetired | BaulchRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 1 | — |
| World Championship medals | 2 | — |
| 100 m best | 10.91 | — |
| 200 m best | 22.21 | — |
| NCAA titles | 3 | — |
| World indoor golds | — | 1 |
| Olympic medals | — | 1 |
| World Championship relay golds | — | 1 |
| 400 m best | — | 44.57 |
| Commonwealth medals | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 86 |
Aleen Bailey leads with a GOAT score of 81.0 against 81.0 for Jamie Baulch — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Baulch does not lead any of the five categories; Bailey is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bailey: 81.0, Baulch: 81.0.
Make your case for Bailey vs Baulch. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.