Who is better, Jiménez or Couch?
Jane Couch leads with a GOAT score of 80.7 against 80.6 for Alejandra Jiménez — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Jiménez vs Couch
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jane Couch above Alejandra Jiménez: 80.7 vs 80.6. Jane Couch leads on Longevity. Alejandra Jiménez leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
CouchWinner
80.7Couch wins: Longevity
Jiménez
80.6Jiménez wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Candidates
Locked to BoxingShareable URL · /compare/alejandra-jimenez-vs-jane-couch
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Jane Couch
80.7
Couch leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Jane Couch
2. Alejandra Jiménez
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇲🇽 Alejandra Jiménez5 years played · career day 1,825363 title wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Jane Couch5 years played · career day 1,82517 title wins
-95.3% vs Jiménez at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇲🇽 Jiménez | 0 | 0 | 50 | 111 | 363 | 478 |
| 🇬🇧 Couch | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 17 | 26 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Couch80.7
Jiménez80.6
FAQ
Where does Jiménez beat Couch?
Jiménez scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Couch leads on longevity.
How is the Jiménez vs Couch score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Jiménez: 80.6, Couch: 80.7.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Jiménez vs Couch. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.