Who is better, Atanasijević or Buša?
Aleksandar Atanasijević leads with a GOAT score of 79.8 against 79.5 for Bianka Buša — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Aleksandar Atanasijević above Bianka Buša: 79.8 vs 79.5. Aleksandar Atanasijević leads on Longevity, Statistics. Bianka Buša leads on Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Atanasijević wins: Longevity, Statistics
Buša wins: Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/aleksandar-atanasijevic-vs-bianka-busa
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Atanasijević leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇷🇸 Atanasijević | 0 | 0 | 52 | 116 | 372 | 732 |
| 🇷🇸 Buša | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 248 | 690 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AtanasijevićActive | BušaActive |
|---|---|---|
| European Championship titles | 1 | 1 |
| World League medals | 2 | — |
| Italian league titles | 1 | — |
| Club European medals | 2 | — |
| Years at the top level | 16 | — |
| World Championship titles | — | 1 |
| Nations League medals | — | 1 |
| Olympic Games contested | — | 2 |
| Club league titles | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 78 |
Aleksandar Atanasijević leads with a GOAT score of 79.8 against 79.5 for Bianka Buša — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Buša scores higher on honours. Atanasijević leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Atanasijević: 79.8, Buša: 79.5.
Make your case for Atanasijević vs Buša. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.