Who is better, Averbukh or Balakhonova?
Anzhela Balakhonova leads with a GOAT score of 83.2 against 83.1 for Aleksandr Averbukh — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Anzhela Balakhonova above Aleksandr Averbukh: 83.2 vs 83.1. Anzhela Balakhonova leads on Dominance, Longevity. Aleksandr Averbukh leads on Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Balakhonova wins: Dominance, Longevity
Averbukh wins: Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/aleksandr-averbukh-vs-anzhela-balakhonova
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Balakhonova leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇱 Averbukh | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11.5 | 35.08 |
| 🇺🇦 Balakhonova | 0 | 0 | 45 | 97 | 295 | 643 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AverbukhRetired | BalakhonovaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| European titles | 2 | — |
| World Championship medals | 2 | 1 |
| Personal best in metres | 5.93 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 3 | — |
| National records | 1 | — |
| European records set | — | 1 |
| Personal best in centimetres | — | 460 |
| Ukrainian titles | — | 8 |
| Olympic finals | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 86 |
Anzhela Balakhonova leads with a GOAT score of 83.2 against 83.1 for Aleksandr Averbukh — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Averbukh scores higher on honours. Balakhonova leads on dominance, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Averbukh: 83.1, Balakhonova: 83.2.
Make your case for Averbukh vs Balakhonova. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.