Who is better, Mostovoi or Wörns?
Aleksandr Mostovoi leads with a GOAT score of 76.3 against 76.3 for Christian Wörns — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Aleksandr Mostovoi and Christian Wörns level at 76.3. Aleksandr Mostovoi leads on Statistics, Peak. Christian Wörns leads on Honours, Longevity, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Mostovoi wins: Peak, Statistics
Wörns wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/aleksandr-mostovoi-vs-christian-woerns
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Mostovoi leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Mostovoi — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | MostovoiRetired | WörnsRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Russian Footballer of the Year awards | 1 | — |
| Soviet Top League titles | 2 | — |
| Russia caps | 50 | — |
| La Liga appearances | 238 | — |
| La Liga goals | 51 | — |
| Career league goals | — | 29 |
| Germany caps | — | 66 |
| Bundesliga titles | — | 1 |
| DFB-Pokal titles | — | 2 |
| UEFA Euro runner-up | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 75 |
| Peak w20% | 80 | 78 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 72 | 75 |
| Statistics w15% | 76 | 70 |
Aleksandr Mostovoi leads with a GOAT score of 76.3 against 76.3 for Christian Wörns — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Wörns scores higher on dominance, honours, longevity. Mostovoi leads on peak, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Mostovoi: 76.3, Wörns: 76.3.
Make your case for Mostovoi vs Wörns. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.