Who is better, Boggiatto or Bremer?
Alessio Boggiatto leads with a GOAT score of 75.6 against 75.5 for Chris-Carol Bremer — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Alessio Boggiatto above Chris-Carol Bremer: 75.6 vs 75.5. Alessio Boggiatto leads on Longevity. Chris-Carol Bremer leads on Statistics, Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Boggiatto wins: Longevity
Bremer wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/alessio-boggiatto-vs-chris-carol-bremer
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Boggiatto leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 Boggiatto | 0 | 0 | 55 | 121 | 383 | 707 |
| 🇩🇪 Bremer | 0 | 0 | 52 | 116 | 354 | 458 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BoggiattoRetired | BremerRetired |
|---|---|---|
| European titles | 2 | — |
| World Championship medals | 1 | — |
| Italian national titles | 12 | — |
| Olympic Games contested | 3 | — |
| Years at the top level | 13 | — |
| European Championship medals | — | 1 |
| German titles | — | 4 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 1 |
| World Championship appearances | — | 1 |
| National records | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 68 | 70 |
| Peak w20% | 82 | 82 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 72 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 76 | 80 |
Alessio Boggiatto leads with a GOAT score of 75.6 against 75.5 for Chris-Carol Bremer — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Bremer scores higher on dominance, honours, statistics. Boggiatto leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Boggiatto: 75.6, Bremer: 75.5.
Make your case for Boggiatto vs Bremer. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.