Who is better, Baumann or le Clos?
Alex Baumann leads with a GOAT score of 87.8 against 87.8 for Chad le Clos — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Alex Baumann and Chad le Clos level at 87.8. Alex Baumann leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Chad le Clos leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Baumann wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
le Clos wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/alex-baumann-vs-chad-le-clos
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Baumann leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Baumann | 0 | 0 | 45 | 99 | 315 | 643 |
| 🇿🇦 le Clos | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 228.4 | 793.7 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BaumannRetired | le ClosActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 2 | — |
| World records set | 4 | — |
| Commonwealth titles | 4 | — |
| Pan American titles | 2 | — |
| Canadian titles | 38 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 1 |
| Olympic medals | — | 4 |
| World short course golds | — | 17 |
| Commonwealth golds | — | 8 |
| 200m butterfly best (sec) | — | 112.68 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 88 |
Alex Baumann leads with a GOAT score of 87.8 against 87.8 for Chad le Clos — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
le Clos scores higher on longevity. Baumann leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Baumann: 87.8, le Clos: 87.8.
Make your case for Baumann vs le Clos. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.