Who is better, Baumann or Paltrinieri?
Gregorio Paltrinieri leads with a GOAT score of 87.9 against 87.8 for Alex Baumann — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Gregorio Paltrinieri above Alex Baumann: 87.9 vs 87.8. Gregorio Paltrinieri leads on Longevity. Alex Baumann leads on Peak, Statistics, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Paltrinieri wins: Longevity
Baumann wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/alex-baumann-vs-gregorio-paltrinieri
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Paltrinieri leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Baumann | 0 | 0 | 45 | 99 | 315 | 643 |
| 🇮🇹 Paltrinieri | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 25 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BaumannRetired | PaltrinieriActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 2 | 1 |
| World records set | 4 | — |
| Commonwealth titles | 4 | — |
| Pan American titles | 2 | — |
| Canadian titles | 38 | — |
| Olympic medals | — | 5 |
| World Championship golds | — | 7 |
| European Championship golds | — | 15 |
| World records | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 88 |
Gregorio Paltrinieri leads with a GOAT score of 87.9 against 87.8 for Alex Baumann — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Baumann scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Paltrinieri leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Baumann: 87.8, Paltrinieri: 87.9.
Make your case for Baumann vs Paltrinieri. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.